About this blog

Greetings! You have arrived at Blog for the new book, Letters to the Editor, that were never published--and some other stuff . It is a compilation of the many letters o the editor that I have written in the past several years. I am continuing to write letters to the editor to various publications, like The New York Times,The record (of Bergen County, NJ) Psychiatric News, Newsweek, etc. They will be posted on this blog for your perusal and, hopefully, comments.

As an introduction to my book," Letters to the Editor that were never published," here is my introduction , synopsis, and index of chapters into which I have organized my letters.



INTRODUCTION


The New York Times is a journal like no other. National and international potentates of all sorts eye its contents warily, ---and hopefully, for educated reports and opinions about their doings.

It is an on-going enclyclopedia encompassing local, national and international events, along with the business world, all the arts, visual and performance: music, theater, dance, and all the rest of interesting show-biz, movies, and TV. Then there’s sports, food, society, many varieties of science, religion, history, military activities, research in many areas, medicine. In other words, endless interesting items and subjects that are changing all the time, as it keeps up with contemporary knowledge and devlopments throughout the world. It is an incredible educational resource encompassing a wide scope of human achievement, knowledge and interest. It is a convenient resource for one to acquire for themselves an impressive post-graduate education.

Perhaps the most interesting is the editorial section, with its in-house editorials, usually about something special going on at the time. The whole Op-Ed page is dedicated to major articles by outstanding authorities, important contributors in their field. The “Letters to the Editor” section is set aside for interested readers to contribute expressions of opinion about some article in a recent issue. Unfortunatley the chances of beiing published is quite slim--like one in a thousand--because that’s the number of letters the letter editor receives each day!

I have been addicted to writing letters for possible appearance on that page, and fortunately, and happily, over the years I have seen a handful of my letters in print. But I have written well over a hundred in the last decade. I decided to get them into print one way or an other. Amazon.com has a new program in which they will publish an author gratis to appear in their e-book program--which is more than a golden opportunity --to which I expect to be admitted .

The prevalence of new and interesting publishers referred to as ”on-order publishers” makes it much easier to get a book published nowadays. I have fortunately selected Trafford Publishing to do mine.

So, along with “Letters to the Editor of The New York Times’, and other publications, like The Record ( BergenCounty, N.J.), Newsweek, Business Week, the New York Post and Psychiatric News, a scientific publication aimed at psychiatrists, I have included a bunch of essays on topics of interest to me--as well as dissertations on a number of topics of broad interest, which, hopefully, will be of interest to my readers

Inasmuch as many of these letters have reference to the same or similar subjects, there is some repetition from one article to another, which I have tried to minimize without losing the gist.


PREFACE

Organizing my collection of some 150 or so of such letters and brief essays, this book is a compilation of my offerings in the subjects of most interest to myself and of most general interest, representing major issues of the day that are controversial and looking for solutions.

The letters to the editor, letters to prominent influential people, my own essays on a variety of subjects, and some other odd notes here and there are organized in chapters for continuity.

Each chapter is opened with a general description of the subject, its history, a general description of its scope, developments, and characteristics. There follows individal letters expressing my own opinion about specific Times articles on various aspects of the subject involved.

The chapter of Essays includes more lengthy dissertations on subjects of interest in our culture about which I have especially strong feelings, either for or against.

Again, I want to mention that there is some repetition from one item to another, inasmch as they are on similar topics and to eliminate all repetitious sentences would interfere with the flow of the particular content of the letter.


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Chapter 1 Psychiatry

Chapter 2 Psychoanalysis

Chapter 3 Depression

Chapter 4 Religion

Chapter 5 Bishops and Priests

Chapter 6 Homosexuality

Chapter 7 Violence

Chapter 8 Miscellaneous

Chapter 9 Essays

Saturday, August 15, 2009

 Atheism Is Not a Religion

The current presidential candidates  are on the spot to confess their religious beliefs as is no other previous election. It is said that an atheist could never be elected to the White House. It would be political suicide for any candidate to deny his or her affiliation with a religious faith.  However, to attest to belief in a god doesn't necessarily mean one really does. Certainly if all those who said they were Christian believers really were, it would be a different society altogether, in my opinion. America is hardly a Christian country.  According to the Bible,----Jesus , Himself,--- it is a land of adulterers and fornicators, as any remarried divorcees are adulterers and any sex out of marriage is fornication.  Adultery is the subject of one of the ten commandments, and fornication, according to St Paul is such that he admonishes widows and single women  to marry, " for it is better to marry than to burn".
Atheists these days are seen as pariahs -- an evil bunch of dissidents , a threat to organized religions.---social undesirables. Only last week the Pope advised Catholics not to see a movie which he felt encouraged atheism.  However, atheism is not a cult or a movement aimed at debunking any religion. Atheists do not proselytize, preach or attempt to convert others to their beliefs, or otherwise attempt to  encourage others to join them, Nor do they hate and voice intolerance of believers, as Christians do  non-believers.. Rather than using the term atheist  to describe this group, , it is more accurate to use the term "non-believer". This more explicitly describes their position. Non-believers are not against any belief system, They just don't subscribe to any. After all, no one--up to and including the Pope in Rome, "knows" whether there is a living God in the sky who is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, etc.   God is  the subject of a variety of religious belief systems--- not a fact. The question " Do you believe in god?' should really read " Do you believe there is a god?"  The non-believer would answer, " No I don't". And when you come right down to it, the minority non-believers have as much chance of being right as the believers--because, either there is or there isn't a supreme god, as described by the various religions. Although the vast majority of Americans say they believe in a god, it doesn't make their position  more likely to be true than the minority who disagree. Non-believers are not intolerant of believers, nor do they try to change other's beliefs. Non-believers are not threatened by those who disagree with them as are many religious adherents. Those religions that  condemn non-believers to hell or advocate death to "infidels" merely reveal their own doubts, fearing that the slightest test might undermine their positions. Christians used to execute heretics and some  Muslims still advocate it.  Do they really think their god approves of this? As Rheinhold  Niebuhr one said," religious fanaticism is rooted in doubt.


Even the Pope Doesn't Get It!

In the Times today, ( Page A22) the Pope is quoted as saying the church must
" address the sin of abuse within the wider context of sexual mores".   What the Pope doesn't get is that the idea that  sexual abuse of children is a sin in the eyes of the church is the least of its evils in this society. Sexual abuse of children is a crime--a felony- -punishable by imprisonment. it is also  very destructive to  the child, often causing life-long psychological damage requiring lengthy therapy in some cases. His viewing only the religious infraction as the important one, reveals his own lack of understanding of human psychosexual development and the potential psychological trauma to thousands of children  caused by pedophile priests.  It is also an attempt to minimize the disastrous effects of this problem by the Catholic Church  by calling it merely a "scandal". It's much worse than a scandal! As Jesus, himself said, " anyone who would harm one of these little ones, it would better a millstone be tied around his neck and he be cast into the depths of the sea".

No comments: